Talk:Gliese 682
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Merger proposal
[edit]I propose merging Gliese 682 c into this article. Both articles are stubs, and the planet's existence is dubious (see the Feng et al. ref). SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 17:33, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- What's wrong with unconfirmed planets?🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 20:18, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support merge; nothing is wrong with unconfirmed planets, but they are best discussed in the context of the broader topic (star system). There is also overlap, as the key cited paper reports properties of the star itself. Klbrain (talk) 07:18, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- There's something terribly wrong with Wikipedia exoplanet articles.
- Support merge; nothing is wrong with unconfirmed planets, but they are best discussed in the context of the broader topic (star system). There is also overlap, as the key cited paper reports properties of the star itself. Klbrain (talk) 07:18, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- If there are reliable sources about an unconfirmed candidate, then the page SHOULD NOT BE MERGED.
- And stop treating KOIs and Kepler planets like they're different.
- They're not.
- 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 02:24, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
- Merged. Or at least the exoplanet article was replaced with a redirect to here since the relevant information is already in this article. !!!!
- 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 02:24, 1 August 2021 (UTC)